How does Willy Russell address issues of gender in the extracts from Shirley Valentine Essay Example

How does Willy Russell address issues of gender in the extracts from Shirley Valentine? Essay The 1980s was a decade of reform from what was considered the expected roles of society. A major youth society emerged with more youths being independent from their older generations at an earlier age; this is signified by the masses of music written at the time aimed at the youth and the boost in nightclubs. Following the movements of the 70s and early 80s womens rights had been greatly changed; their roles in the work place had been widened, women now could take more senior positions as equals to the men unlike generations before where women would be housewives or be employed work which was seen as appropriately feminine at the time. Similarly roles in the relationships were changing; those women who were now full time worker in powerful positions could no longer look after the children and household as housewives, as was common in previous generations, instead it became more common for marriages and families to be formed late in life, for relationships where the roles of the housewife would be shared between both husband and wife or even for the husband to assume the role as a househusband. It is here in this time where Willy Russell sets his play Shirley Valentine. The play is a monologue from the character Shirley, a middle aged woman, the wife of Joe, a believer that a womans role is as a housewife, and a mother to two children both of who have move away from home and are part of the new youth culture. In the play Shirley tells the audience of her situation at home and how it lead her to go to Greece in search of her lost youth, to become Shirley Valentine again the girl she was before her marriage to Joe. We will write a custom essay sample on How does Willy Russell address issues of gender in the extracts from Shirley Valentine? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on How does Willy Russell address issues of gender in the extracts from Shirley Valentine? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on How does Willy Russell address issues of gender in the extracts from Shirley Valentine? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Within the play Shirleys monologue script contains various areas reflecting upon the gender roles in conversational styles. As it is written in the monologue form it is Shirleys interpretation of the events which is presented as well as her attitudes and values toward them, for instance when Shirley tells of her first meeting with Costas she describes how she perceives the conversational style of a typical man, Most men, really, there no good at talkin with women. They dont know how to listen or they feel that they have to take over the conversation. This speech, and the example which Shirley also includes with it, holds various evidence within it for all of the three of the gender conversational models. The dominance model, the male conversationalist sees the woman as a disadvantaged speaker and feels the need to assert himself as the dominant participant, this is how Shirley perceives the situation but by looking at the evidence closer the reader can justify the two other gender models. The difference model, the male conversationalist style sees the situation differently than the female perceiving the topic raised as a discussion he then develops her topic to continue the conversation. The deficit model, the female conversationalist lacks a tag on her opening line encouraging no response from the male and losing topic control, in this model the woman lacks the techniques to collaborate with the man. Another opinion of Shirleys is that Costas is not like other men with his conversational style. When she talks to Costas Shirley maintains topic control, often by using politeness strategies, to which Costas responds politely and without threatening behaviour or aggressive dominance technique such as her husband Joe uses. At home Shirleys conversations with Joe show him to use dominance techniques, such as demands, taboo language threatening language, physical actions and minimal responses, he said I am not eating shit, and honest to God, an he pushed the plate the entire length of the table. By doing this Joe hopes to keep topic control but often this is not so as Shirleys quick witted more literate conversational style often defeats him, he goes, Whats this? What. Is. This? I said to him, I said, well when I cooked it was egg an chips, an as neither of us is Paul Daniels Im assumin it still is egg an chips. this sarcastic wit, which Shirley uses against Joe in order to wrestle topic control from him, is not found in her conversations with Costas, as his conversational style is very different to Joes. Costas conversational style incorporates many features commonly associated with the female conversational style, politeness, which allows Shirley to maintain topic control, and verbosity rather than the minimal response characteristic associated with male conversational style. Shirleys conversational style, unlike the two male characters Joe and Carlos, doe not remain constant through out but rather progresses changing converging with her situation. At the beginning of the play Shirleys conversations tend to be a battle for topic control with Joe and using her intelligible nature and literate advantage she produces various sarcastic witty phrases to achieve topic control. Later at the end of the play Shirleys style has changed dramatically, her use of taboo language and long pauses in her speech mirror male speech and seem to show a convergence with Joe as she has gained her understanding of the world. Overall Willy Russell has shown gender conversational styles to be diverse and controversial, not unique to a gender but diverse. This can be seen through the conversational styles of Joe, dominant, threatening, and using minimal responses, and Carlos, polite and veracious, one thought of as a typically male style the other a feminine style. Shirley also shows this diversity through her changing of styles to incorporate the typically masculine features at the end of the play but also in her example of male speech where the gender models can all be met preventing it being classified as one definite style.

Summary and Analysis of introduction to the Scarlet letter essays

Summary and Analysis of introduction to the Scarlet letter essays Semi-fictional, this chapter explains how the romance of The Scarlet Letter came to presented as a story to the audience. Having always wanted to be a "literary man," the writer talks about his three-year stint as a Surveyor in the Salem Custom House. Mostly filled with older gentlemen, the workplace was a very political (Whig) environment and charged with Puritan history. After brief character sketches of the personalities in the Custom House, the writer then explains how he came upon a special package among the piles of papers. It contained a red cloth with "A" embroidered in gold thread and a manuscript by Jonathan Pue (the man who once held the writer's job). Finding the story extremely interesting, the author thus retells the story of Hester Prynne from Massachusetts' Puritan history. This section helps to position the voice of the narrator since we are going to hear comments throughout the rest of the novel. It reveals insecurities that the narrator has in pursuing a writing career. When he imagines that his "great-grandsire" Puritan ancestors are looking down on him, saying, "A writer of storybooks! What kind of business in life - what mode of glorifying God, or being serviceable to mankind in his day and generation - may that be? Why the degenerate fellow might as well have been a fiddler!" he dramatizes the anxiety he feels about writing for a living. His religious forebears think that it is a ridiculous profession, not at all useful to elevating God or anything else. Because he feels he has something to prove to his great-grandsires and to history, he wants this chance to show off his literary skills. Hester Prynne's story gives him the perfect opportunity since it does deal with God and piety (although his take on the story is not one his ancestors would be likely to agree with). His ambivalent attitude towards the "patriarchs" appears again when he speaks of a permanent Inspector of the Custom House. Though the man has "n...